Skip to content

Hot

The 1 most-discussed game AI stories of the last 48 hours · updated Oct 9 13:25
NO.01No comparison

Google and Unity launch connected no-code AI game creation platforms on the same day

Google and Unity released their respective AI game creation platforms on the same day and announced that the two connect: Google launched the experimental Google Playground, Unity released Unity Spark, a browser-based tool built to pair with it, and the two companies call the whole environment Playground. Playground lets users generate, play and share custom games in the browser from conversational prompts, with no programming required, and more than a dozen games that have passed safety review are already on the site; for now, however, trials are limited to US residents, and the ability to create is opened up in tiers based on a user's Google AI subscription. Unity Spark requires no Unity or game development experience and connects to the thousands of community art assets in the Unity Asset Store. According to the Financial Times, it can also generate some assets, but most images and effects come from the existing asset library, and contributing artists receive credit and payment. Google says Playground will connect to Spark soon, while Spark itself will first be released through a closed beta starting later this year, requiring users to join a waitlist; the editor supports desktop browsers only, creations can be played in desktop and mobile browsers, and both are restricted to users 18 and over. At launch, Spark creations cannot be exported to the desktop Unity engine or sold; credits come with a certain free allowance and cost money beyond that, and pricing details and the business model are not yet finalized.

24-hour heatPeak 24 · 16 h ago
24 h agoNow

LatestGoogle Releases Its Own Game Creation Platform

80 Level, Game Developer and 2 other sources·4 participants
15
Heat index
How is heat calculated?About the list

Heat comes from the independent accounts and organizations taking part in the same story. Each counts once however often it is collected, and its weight halves every 24 hours. Heat measures how active the discussion is, not the quality of the coverage.

The list covers the last 48 hours. Trends only compare the same set of continuously covered sources, so they reflect what we monitor, not the whole web. Without comparable history, no trend line is shown.

The source list shows only coverage that can be read publicly; participants also include accounts and organizations that only count toward heat. Several channels of one organization may count as one, so there may be fewer participants than sources. Open a story to see each side's coverage and views.

Surging
Discussion growing fast
New
First reported within 6 hours
Rising
Discussion still growing